Global oil prices pose threat to Pakistan's fiscal stability: report

Global oil prices pose threat to Pakistan's fiscal stability: report
Updated on

Summary According to the report, Pakistan’s budgeted federal primary surplus of Rs. 1,706 billion, equivalent to 1.3 percent of GDP, is highly vulnerable to external oil shocks.

ISLAMABAD (APP) - The Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE) has released a new policy viewpoint titled “Managing Oil Shocks: Pakistan’s Fiscal Risks and Policy Choices”, warning that rising global oil prices pose a serious threat to Pakistan’s fiscal stability and ongoing consolidation efforts.

The report is authored by Dr Nasir Iqbal, Registrar/Professor of Economics at PIDE; Dr. Shahzada M. Naeem Nawaz, Professor of Economics at PIDE; and Amna Riaz, Research Economist at PIDE, a news release said on Sunday.

The study finds that the latest oil price shock, driven by escalating geopolitical tensions in the Gulf region, especially the Israel-US-Iran conflict and disruptions in petroleum supply routes, could significantly weaken the government’s fiscal position and reduce its ability to maintain macroeconomic stability.

According to the report, Pakistan’s budgeted federal primary surplus of Rs. 1,706 billion, equivalent to 1.3 percent of GDP, is highly vulnerable to external oil shocks.

Under a moderate shock scenario, where oil prices rise to $100 per barrel, the primary surplus could decline to Rs1,002 billion.

In a severe scenario of $120 per barrel, it may fall further to Rs. 821 billion, while in an extreme case of $144 per barrel, it could shrink to just Rs. 781 billion.

At the same time, the fiscal deficit may widen from the budgeted Rs 6,501 billion, or 5.0 percent of GDP, to as high as Rs 7,517 billion, or 5.8 percent of GDP, reflecting a sharp rise in fiscal stress.

The report argues that oil shocks affect Pakistan not only through a larger import bill, but also by intensifying inflation, increasing pressure on the exchange rate, slowing economic activity, and weakening confidence across the economy.

As an oil-importing country with deep structural dependence on external energy markets, Pakistan remains highly exposed to fluctuations in global crude prices.

The study notes that past episodes of elevated oil prices have consistently translated into imported inflation, external account pressures, subsidy burdens, and deterioration in fiscal buffers.

Historical patterns presented in the report show that when Brent crude exceeded $110 per barrel in earlier periods, inflation in Pakistan remained in double digits, while periods of lower oil prices brought temporary macroeconomic relief.

PIDE stresses that the fiscal consequences of oil shocks go beyond fuel pricing decisions. They also emerge through lower revenue collection, increased energy-sector support requirements, exchange-rate pressures, and broader contingent liabilities.

The report highlights that petroleum levy collections and subsidy expenditures have long remained central to Pakistan’s fiscal response during oil price pressures.

However, with the country currently operating under the IMF’s Extended Fund Facility and facing strict fiscal targets, the room for discretionary reduction in the petroleum levy is limited.

This makes the federal primary balance the most important indicator for assessing whether Pakistan can absorb an external oil shock without undermining debt sustainability and stabilization gains.

PIDE calls for a disciplined and forward-looking policy strategy, recommending that the government keep the primary balance at the center of fiscal management, strengthen tax administration, improve compliance, reduce leakages, accelerate digital monitoring of high-yield sectors, and create fiscal space by curbing non-essential current expenditures.

At the same time, it emphasized the need to protect social protection spending and high-impact development priorities, while continuing to invest in infrastructure, productivity, and export-supporting sectors so that fiscal adjustment does not come at the cost of long-term resilience and growth.

It stressed for a credible and pre-defined fiscal contingency framework to manage moderate, severe and extreme oil price shocks.