Bangladesh's democracy faces strain as Hasina is reelected amid a boycott by opposition parties
World
Bangladesh’s democracy faces strain as Hasina is reelected amid a boycott by opposition parties
DHAKA, Bangladesh (AP) — Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has swept to power for a fourth consecutive term in Bangladesh, following an election on Sunday that was boycotted by opposition parties and marked by violent protests and international scrutiny.
Her Awami League party won 222 seats out of 299, according to the Election Commission, cementing a majority in Parliament and extending her 15-year rule that has made Hasina one of the most defining and divisive leaders in the nation’s history.
Hasina’s victory, widely seen as inevitable, came amid low voter turnout at 41.8% in a severely contentious climate that saw opposition members jailed ahead of the polls. Analysts say the clampdown on political foes and stifling of dissent puts Bangladesh’s democracy in a fragile position, risks triggering political turmoil and may test some of its diplomatic ties.Campaigning was rife with violence and the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party and its allies boycotted the vote, saying that Hasina’s government could not oversee free and fair polls.
“This is not a story of a thumping, resounding reaction from the people. There is a question mark in the public’s mind about this election, so the result that has come will face this taint,” said Avinash Paliwal, who specializes in South Asia relations at London’s SOAS University.
The vote also spotlighted a troublesome electoral record, being the third in the last 15 years to be dogged by credibility concerns. The previous two votes were widely seen as flawed with allegations of vote-rigging, which authorities denied, and another opposition boycott. All three elections were held under Hasina’s rule.
The main opposition party has demanded a fresh election to establish a “legitimate” government.
This is likely “to ratchet up rather than rein in political tensions” and fan further polarization instead of reconciliation, said Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center.
The government has defended the polls as open and inclusive, but critics have pointed out that many smaller opposition groups and independent candidates belonged to the ruling party, which left voters with few options.
In a post-election press conference on Monday, Hasina said Bangladesh had set an example of holding a free, fair and impartial election.
“It’s not my victory. I think it is a victory of the people,” she declared.
While Hasina is often credited with presiding over Bangladesh’s impressive growth in recent years, experts say its economy is now sputtering. Foreign exchange reserves have dwindled to less than three months’ worth of imports, the price of groceries has surged and a wave of labor protests from the country’s prized garment industry has highlighted dissatisfaction with the government.
Experts say economic discontent is widespread in Bangladesh, which means Hasina’s handling of the economy will be key, especially to regain legitimacy among disenchanted voters who skipped the polls.
The political tumult surrounding the election also risks straining Bangladesh’s ties with the U.S., the biggest buyer of its garment exports. Relations have been tense for months, especially after Washington vowed to impose visa restrictions on anyone disrupting the electoral process. Hasina accused the U.S. of trying to plot her ouster.
Pierre Prakash, Asia director at the International Crisis Group, said the U.S. made Bangladesh a showcase of the Biden administration’s values-based foreign policy, which emphasizes human rights and democratic freedoms.
Dhaka is an important trade and strategic partner for Washington in Asia, where it is trying to counter Chinese influence, but the Biden administration has been vocal about its concerns surrounding the election.
“We’ll have to see how the U.S. behaves. There could be sanctions on the horizon, but we don’t know for sure,” Prakash said, adding that these could target individuals or apply more broadly to a sector, which could pinch citizens.