LONDON (Reuters) - Judges in England and Wales can use generative artificial intelligence systems like OpenAI's ChatGPT for basic work tasks but must not use chatbots to conduct legal research or undertake legal analysis, according to guidance issued on Tuesday.
Judges were also warned about signs that legal arguments may have been prepared by an AI chatbot, as has already happened in the United States and recently in Britain.
The guidance issued by the judiciary said references to unfamiliar or even bogus cases and parties citing different bodies of case law on the same legal issue may indicate the use of AI.
Geoffrey Vos, who is Head of Civil Justice in England and Wales, said the guidance was the first of its kind in the jurisdiction.
He told reporters at a briefing before the guidance was published that AI "provides great opportunities for the justice system".
"But, because it is so new, we need to make sure that judges at all levels understand what it does, how it does it, and what it cannot do," he added.
Vos said judges were well equipped to distinguish between genuine legal arguments and those prepared using AI, as well as the potential use of so-called deepfakes as evidence.
"Judges are trained to decide what is true and what is false and they are going to have to do that in the modern world of AI just as much as they had to do that before," he said.