Fawad all praise for LHC for striking down sedition law
Pakistan
Fawad retweeted Advocate Abuzar Salman Niazi tweet who moved the LHC against the colonial era law.
ISLAMABAD (Dunya News) – Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader and former minister Fawad Chaudhry has hailed the Lahore High Court (LHC) for striking down Section 124-A of the criminal law that pertains to sedition.
Fawad took to twitter and retweeted Advocate Abuzar Salman Niazi 's tweet, who moved the LHC against the colonial-era law.
“Congratulations, Salman Niazi, you have done a huge service to the nation. Shaheed Arshad Sharif must be smiling in the heavens.. stay blessed,” wrote Fawad in his tweet.
Congratulations @SalmanKNiazi1 you have done a hug service to the nation #ShaheedArshadSharif must be smiling in the heavens.. stay blessed https://t.co/eNluJPdqgb
— Ch Fawad Hussain (@fawadchaudhry) March 30, 2023
He said “the Lahore High Court declared Section 124-A of the criminal law in conflict with the Constitution, whereby recognising the constitutional right to criticise state institutions.
بڑی خبر ! لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے فوجداری قانون کی دفعہ 124-A کو آئین سے متصادم قرار دے دیا، ریاستی اداروں تنقید کا آئینی حق تسلیم کر کیا گیا ہے، اس فیصلے سے میرے مقدمے سمیت درجنوں سیاسی بنیادوں پر بنائے مقدمے ختم ہو جاتے ہیں بہت اعلی اور آزادی کے اصولوں کو تسلیم کیا جانیوالا فیصلہ ۔۔
— Ch Fawad Hussain (@fawadchaudhry) March 30, 2023
"This decision will end dozens of politically-motivated cases, including case against me. It is a very high decision that recognizes freedom," Fawad noted.
The case
Earlier on Thursday, Justice Shahid Karim of the LHC pronounced the verdict that invalidated Section 124-A of the Pakistan Penal Code, commonly known as sedition law, which pertains to the crime of sedition or inciting “disaffection” against the government.
Justice Karim pronounced the decision in response to identical petitions seeking annulment of the law. A written ruling will be issued later.
The law states: “Whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, the Federal or Provincial Government established by law shall be punished with imprisonment for life to which fine may be added, or with imprisonment which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine.”
The petitioners urged the court to declare Section 124-A of the PPC as “ultra-vires in terms of Article 8 of the Constitution being inconsistent with and in derogation of fundamental rights provided under Article 9, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 19, 19A of the Constitution”.
They argued that the law has been recklessly used as a tool of exploitation to curb the right to free speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution.
They submitted that the law enacted in 1860 was “an illegitimate limitation and restriction on the legitimate, legal and lawful exercise of the constitutionally guaranteed right of free speech and expression and various other constitutional freedoms.”
The petitioners said that the law was serving as “a notorious tool for the suppression of dissent, free speech and criticism in free and independent Pakistan”.
They cited the cases of Shahbaz Gill, Mohsin Dawar, Ali Wazir from Pashtun Tahaffuz Movement (PTM), which it said, were also facing prosecution on basis of sedition charges.
Moreover, noted journalists Arshad Sharif, Khawar Ghumman, Adeel Raja and Sadaf Abdul Jabbar have been facing prosecution on sedition charges. Javed Hashmi was also sentenced to 23 years in prison on sedition charges,” the plea noted.
Almost all of them who had been booked, investigated, and prosecuted under Section 124-A were acquitted as most of these cases were politically motivated.
The PTI had filed a similar petition in September last which was dismissed by the Islamabad High Court for being “non-maintainable”.
