LHC verdict further deepens political crisis in Punjab: Fawad

Last updated on: 30 June,2022 03:55 pm

PTI to move SC against LHC order: Fawad

ISLAMABAD (Dunya News) - Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader and former information minister Fawad Chaudhry on Thursday announced that the his party will challenge the Lahore High Court (LHC) verdict on pleas against Hamza Shahbaz’s election as Chief Minister Punjab in the Supreme Court over anomalies.

In a message from his Twitter handle, Fawad Chaudhry said that the decision by the Lahore High Court has further complicated the political crisis in the province.

“Hamza Shahbaz has lost his government and the solution given by the court will not bring an end to the crisis,” he said.

Fawad Chaudhry said that there are multiple anomalies in the decision and a meeting of legal advisers has been summoned to mull over it.

“We will raise these anomalies before the Supreme Court,” Fawad Chaudhry said.

It merits mention that political crisis in Punjab has deepened as Lahore High Court (LHC) on Thursday ordered recount of CM Punjab election held on April 16 after excluding votes of 25 de-seated lawmakers of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).

A five member larger bench headed by Justice Sadaqat Ali Khan announced the 4-1 verdict on pleas against Hamza’s election as well as his oath taking.

The court in its verdict states that the decision by Supreme Court of not counting votes of defecting members of a political party is squarely applicable to the election of Chief Minister held on 14th April 2022.

“It is an undeniable fact that 25 members of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf had voted for Mr. Muhammad Hamza Shahbaz, whereas the party had nominated Mr. Pervaiz Ellahi as its candidate.”

“It is an undeniable fact that 25 members of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf had voted for Mr. Muhammad Hamza Shahbaz, whereas the party had nominated Mr. Pervaiz Ellahi as its candidate.”

The court also directed the Presiding Officer (Deputy Speaker) of the election held on 16th April 2022 to recount votes after excluding 25 votes of the defecting members. As a consequence, if required majority, under Article 130(4), is not secured by any candidate, he shall proceed for second and further polls under its provisos for completing the process of election as required under Article 130(4), unless a candidate is elected by majority votes. Though on recounting as directed, the consequential procedure and effect shall be in accordance with the Constitution.

The court further directed that the session, for this purpose, as originally called by the then Governor shall be resumed on 1st July 2022 (Friday) at 4:00 pm without fail and the session so resumed shall not be prorogued till the election process is completed and Presiding officer intimates the result of elected Chief Minister to the Governor under the Rule 21 and the Governor shall preform his duty, under Article 130(5), of administering oath without any hesitation and by ignoring any apprehension regarding conduct election, at any time before 11:00 am very next day.

The court further said that it cannot ignore the disorder in various sessions of the Provincial Assembly and warned that any attempt of disorder from any quarter shall be taken as contempt of court and shall be proceeded accordingly by this Larger Bench on formal information by any person.