Records of Ahli Steel Mills sale submitted to SC by Sharif family

Dunya News

The lawyer of Hassan Nawaz and Hussain Nawaz submitted new documents in reply to Panama JIT report

(Web Desk) – Dunya News has exclusively obtained the latest documents submitted by the lawyer of Hassan Nawaz and Hussain Nawaz in Panama case. Hussain Nawazs legal team has challenged the findings in JIT report with new money trail of London flats.

The records have been attested by Dubai authorities in which it is stated that the Sharif family sold 25pc of its Ahli Steel Mills  shares on 14th April, 1980. The agreement with Gulf Steel Mills has also been presented in the new documents. These records will be heard by the apex court in next proceeding by 3-member Panama case implementation bench.



Sharifs sold their shares for 12 million dirhams which occurred from May 15 to November 15 in 1980. The records include Gulf Steel Mills agreement which will be presented in court. It should be noted that the lawyer of PM’s sons Salman Akram Raja had promised to submit new documents in the apex court.

On the other hand, the letter of JPCA Limited to run Nielsen and Nescoll was also received. According to the letter, Hussain Nawaz met JPCA in 2014 to discuss the management of these offshore companies. The administrative matters were transferred from Minerva Services to JPCA on June 2, 2014. The letter reads that Hussain Nawaz is the beneficiary owner of Nielsen and Nescoll and JPCA never met Maryam Nawaz Safdar.



The record includes receipts of scrap sent to Jeddah by Al-Azizia Steel Company Limited according to which the scrap was sent using trucks on December 5, 2001. Hussain Nawaz has accused the JIT of not disclosing these documents in Supreme Court deliberately.

Legal expert Saeed Rusool, in an interview with Dunya News, said these documents appear to be attested because they contain stamps from Dubai authorities. He said the court will inquire why werent such records submitted earlier, adding that these documents could make the JIT report controversial and the matter will then head towards trial court.