Dunya News obtains copy of questionnaire handed over to Nawaz, Maryam
A total of 127 questions have been put to the Sharif family
ISLAMABAD (Dunya News) – Dunya News has obtained a copy of the questionnaire handed over to former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, his daughter Maryam Nawaz and son-in-law Captain (r) Safdar in the Avenfield reference.
The 29-page questionnaire was handed over to Nawaz Sharif, Maryam Nawaz and Capt (r) Safdar by the accountability court in the Avenfield reference.
A total of 127 questions have been put to the Sharif family. The court has put several common questions to all the three accused.
The court ordered Nawaz Sharif to submit response over Hassan Nawaz and Hussain Nawaz’s interview to TV channel and the statements of witnesses Roberty Readly and Akhtar Raja.
Earlier, Khawaja Haris, the counsel of Sharif family had obtained verified data of Panama Leaks case from Supreme Court (SC) ahead of recording his clients’ statements in Avenfield reference.
According to sources, the record includes petitions against Sharif family, written replies of the parties, ex-Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s review petition and other documentations.
The record will be attached with the statements of Nawaz Sharif, his daughter Maryam Nawaz and son-in-law Captain (r) Safdar.
Accountability court had directed Sharif family members to record their statements on May 21 after their counsel Khawaja Harris raised objections over the questionnaire.
Khawaja Harris said that there is ambiguity in few questions due to which time is required.
On the other hand, the lawyer will continue cross-examination of Panama Joint Investigation Team (JIT) head Wajid Zia in Al-Azizia Steel Mills reference on Tuesday.
Previously, Wajid Zia told the court that Hill Metal Establishment earned 9.9 million dollar profit during 2010 to 2017 while Nawaz Sharif received 8.9 million dollar from the company during 2010 to 2015.
SC disqualified Sharif from office in July over unreported sources of annual income of about $10,000, a salary the former premier denies ever receiving. The high court also ordered the NAB to investigate and conduct a trial into the Sharif family’s wider finances, including the London properties.
Sharif was also ousted from the presidency of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) party, which elected close ally Shahid Khaqan Abbasi as prime minister after Sharif was disqualified.
View Questionnaire below:
JUDGE ACCOUNT ABILITY COURT-1,ISLAMABAD.
Interim /Supplementary Ref, No.20/2017
Statement of accused Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif son of Muhammad Sharif,aged about ___ years,resident of Shammim Farms, Jati Umra, Raiwind Roda, Lahore A1/5 342 Cr.P.C
Q.No.1: Have you heard and understood the prosecution evidence recorded against you in this reference ?
Q.No.2: It is in evidence that you (accused) were holder of public office.you had remained Chief Minister Punjab ,Finance Minister Punjab.Prime Minister of Pakistan .Member National Assembly of Pakistan.What do you say about it ?
Q.No.3: It is in evidence that join Investigation Team (JIT) Was anncounced by Honerable Supreme Court of Pakistan with the question which were to be addressed by the JIT including collection of evidence if any showing that you accused or any of your dependents or benamidar owns. Possesses or his acquired assets or any interest therein disproportionate to his know suource of income and JIT may examine the evidence and material already available with NAB and FIA relating to or having any nexus with the possession or acqusition of Avenfield Flats 16, 16-a . 17 and 17-a or any other assets of pecuinary sources and their origin. Certified copy of that order is available as Ex.PW-16 /1.What do you say about it?
Q.No.4: It is in evidence that Honerable Supreme Court of Pakistan set –up the composition of JIT in its order dated 05.05.2017 EX. PW-16/2.Mr. Wajid Zia Addl Director Immigration FIA was made Head of the JIT.what do you say about it?
Q.No.5: It is in evidence that Honerable Supreme Court of Pakistan directed and enumerated different powers of JIT for its functioning in para -3 (i) to para 3(ix) in order dated 05.05.2017 Ex.PW-16/2. What do you say about it ?
Q.NO.6: It is in evidence that JIT commenced its working on 08-05-2017 and submitted its final report consisting on ten Volumes but two volumes having two parts i.e volume and ix of JIT Report. What do you say about it.
Q.No.7: It is in evidence that JIT collected all the documents that were filed by the petitioners of Constitution petition No. and others ,concise statements and documents filed by the respondents including you of that petitions ,and JIT also collected material from different institution like SECP .Banks .FIA. NAB and many others. What do you say about it.
Q.No.8: It is in evidence that notification Ex.PW -16/3 was issued at the request of JIT the powers conferred by section 21 of NAO .1999, to Head of the JIT .What do you say about it?
Q.No.9: It is in evidence that JIT initiated a number of MLAs ,letter of requests to the United Kingdom British Virgin Island Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates ,what do you say about it ?
Q.No.10: It is in evidence that JIT recorded statements of persons who were acquainted with tha fact of the case including you accused Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, Mr. Tariq Shafi, Mr Hussain Nawaz, Mr Hassan Nawaz, Mst. Maryam Safdar and Capt Retd Muhammad Safdar among others. The volume II of the JIT Report is containing those statements and analysis. What do you say about it?
Q.No.11: It is evidence that Assitant Directot/Investigation Officer NAB was authorized for investigation of the instant case in the light of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of Pakistan dated 28-07-2017, authorization letter is Ex.PW-18/1.What do you say about it?
Q.No.12: It is in evidence that during the course of investigation complete JIT report was collected from Volume I to IX-A and are made integral part of the reference submitted in this court. What dou say about it?
Q.No.13: It is in evidence that record pertaining to PANAMA case before Hon’ble Supreme Court of Pakistan was also collected which includes CMAs, through which you accused and others submitted their stance regarding acquisition of Avenfield properties. What do you say about it?
Q.No.14: It is in evidence that you accused and other repondents of petition 29 defended the case by filing different CMAs No.7531/2017, which contains supplementary concise statement on behalf of Maryam Safdar, Hussain and Hassan Nawaz to provided explanation and acquisition of Avenfield Flats No. 16 16-a, 17, 17-a. That concise statement is available as Ex.PW-16/4. What do you say about it?
Q.No.15: It is in evidence that certain documents were submitted with CMA 432/2017 to elaborate money trail by accused Hassan Nawaz and Hussain Nawaz (your sons) on 26.01.2017. What do you say about it?
Q.No.16: It is in evidence that affidavit of Tariq Shafi dated 12.11.2016 EX.PW-16/5 was annexed with CMA No. 7531/2017 while its other affidavit Ex.PW-16/6. Both the affidavits were analyzed by JIT in its report at pages 05 to 21 of Volume 3 and found anomalies and contradictions. What do you say about it?
Q.No.17: Para 3 of the affidavit of Muhammad Shafi (Ex.PW-16/5) shows that Gulf steel Mills was set-up with zero equity, 100% loan and its other partner was Muhammad Hussain. What do you say about it?
Q.No.18: It is in evidence that accused Mr. Hussain was asked by the JIT to provide any corroborative documents like Memorandum of Association, Bank Loan documents, regarding Gulf Steel Mills but no such documents were provided to JIT. What do you say about it?
Q.No.19: It is in evidence that there were three parties Muhammad Sharif, Ahli and BCCI in share sale contract photocopies of the same are available as Ex.PW-16/7. All the proceeds of the 21 million AED were to go to BCCI. The company had a total of 56 million AED (approx) and after payment to BCCI still liability of amount Rs.14 million remained outstanding against the Gulf Steel Mills and these liabilities alongwith liability of 06 million AED owed to BCCI were the responsibility of Mr. Tariq Shafi running it under the real ownership of Mr. Muhammad Sharif. What do you say about it?
Q.No.20: It is in evidence that agreement dnted 14 April 1980,was also placed on CMA No. 7531/2016 and was purportedly between partiec Muhammad tariq Shafi and Muhammad Ahil available as Ex.PW- 16/9 but Tariq Shafi as Well Shabaz Sharif had denied that they had signed this documents before JIT .what do you say about it?
Q.No.21: It is in evidence that the agreement mentioned in above question containc clauses specifically referred to bank guarantee to be provided by.Mr. Abdul Rehman Ahil.what do you say about those clauses/
Q.No.22: It is in evidence that response to MLA with reference to Mr. Muhammad Tariq Shafi in Shape of letter dated 14-04-1980 is available on file as Ex.pw -16/69 with its annexures Ex.PW-16/70 what do you say about it and its contains?
Q.No.23: It is in evidence that PW -01 Mst. Sidra Mansoor produced certified cpies of annual audited of hudaybia paper Mills, which are Ex.pw -1/3 to Ex.pw -1/8 from year 2000 to 2005. What do you say about it?
Q.No.24: It is in evidence of PW-1/0 Mst. Sidra Mansoor Joint Registrar of companies that a long amounting to Rs. 494,960,000/- was outstanding against hudaybia paper Mills . and the status of long term laon remained same from 30.06.2000 to 30.06.2005. what do you say about it?
Q.No.25: It is in evidence of PW Muhammad Imran Addle Director NAB, Lahore that your daughter accused Maryam Safder and your son accused hussain Nawaz were Director and Hassan Nawaz was Share Holder is Hudaybia paper Mills. What do you say about it?
Q.No.26: It is in evidence that Director , Report of Hudaybia paper Mills. Ltd is annexed with CMA 432/2017 at pg 93 to pg 102 as Ex. PW-16/36 what do you say about it?
Q.No.27: It is evidence that I.O sezed the document produced by PW-01 vide seizure memo Ex.pw -1/1. What do you say about it?
Q.No.28: It is in evidence that PW902 Mr.Rasheed handed over document wrapped in saeled envelope which was handed over to him by one Mr. Zaheer Riaz alongwith covering letter Ex.PW-2/1. What do you say about it?
Q.No.29: It is in evidence that wrapped envelope was opened by I.O and he seized the document which were Photocopies of order of Queen,s bench Mark-A, affidavit of Mr. Mazhar Raza Khan Bangesh Mark-b-B, through a seizure memo Ex.PW-2/2. What do you say about the said document and contents thereof?
Q.No.30: It is in evidence that PW-03 Mazhar Raza Khan Bangesh owned affidavit of service (Mark-B), which was submitted by him to his Or, Dignam and Co. What do you say about it?
Q.No.31: It is in evidence that Queen’s Bench Order of 1999 Mark-A was pertaining to the leasehold hand Known as 16 Avenfield House, 117-128 Park Lane London, House 117-128 Park lane London. 17 Avenfield House 118-127 Park Lane, London and 17-A Avenfield house 118-127 park lane. London and that order pertains to hudaybia paper mills Ltd Mian Muhammad shahbazSharif , main Muhammad sharif and main Muhammad Abbas sharif .what do you say about it ?
Q.No.32: It is in evidence that PW -04, Mukhtar Ahmad Sub Inspector Police station NAB, Lahore was entrusted with five call up notices in the present reference, and one of the call up notice was name of you accused Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif , that notice was received by your security officer Jati Umrah but you did not join the investigation , what do you say about it ?
Q.No.33: It is in evidence PW-18 Muhammad Imran , Call –up notices were issued to musaghani and tariqShafi during investigation by NAB and same were handrd over to umerDaraz ,SI Police station NAB Lahore, what do uoy say about it ?
Q.No,34: It is evidence that call up notice (EX.PW-18/Dx1 tp EX,PW-18/Dx5 ) were issued to you (accused mian Muhammad Nawaz sharif ) and other accused MuryamSafdar , CaptRetd Muhammad Safdar , absconding accused Hassan Nawaz Sharif and Hussain Nawaz sharif with a note that in case of non-appearance it would be construed that you and they have nothing more to offer in the defance . what do you say about it ?
Q.No,35: It is in evidence that PW -05 Muhammad Adeel Akhter , is the marginal witness of seizure memos at page 62 and pg 111 and his signature thereon is Ex PW-5/1,what you say about ?
Q.No.36: It is in evidence that PW-06 ShakeelAnjumNagra , obtainedthree sets of attested copies of volume 1 to 1X,and four sets of attested copies of volume X of JIT from Hon’ble superm court of Pakistan Through Assistant Registrar Muhammad Mujahid and one of sets of volume1 to X was and handed over to NAB Lahore .What do you say about ?
Q.No.37: t is in evidence that in presence of PW-07 Zavarmanzoor ,Assistant Director NAB That I.O. seized the record produced by MSt.SidraMansor Join Registrar (PW-01) vide a seizure memo on 23rdAuguest , 2017,his Signature on seizure memo is Ex,Pw -7/1 , what do you say about it ?
Q.No.38: It is in evidence that in presence of PW -07 ZavarMansor that Assistant Director NAB I.O.seized the record produced by Muhammad Rashhed clerk (PW-02) vide a seizure memo on 06.09.2017, the signature on seizure memo is EX ,PW-7/2. What do you say about it?
Q.No.39: It is in evidence that PW -08 Umar Daraz went to the house No ,179-H model Town Lahore .Residence of tariqShafi for service of Call-Up notices on 16.08.2017 but he was told by Abdul latif security Gurad That tariqShafi along with his family had gone abroad since 20.07.2017, what you say about is ?
Q.No.40: It is in evidence that PW -08 UmerDaraz went to the House No ,7-H gulberg III , Lahore , resident of Musa Ghani for service of Call-up notice on 16.08.2017 butt was told Amir Head Constable . In charge police Guard that musaGhani had not been residing therein what do you say about that?
Q.NO41- It is in evidence of pw-09 Muhammad Abdul Wahid Khan DG, Directorate of ElectronicMedia and publications Islamabad that on 05.01.2018 he verified and acknowledge theSending of transcripts and CDs of interview of Hassan Nawaz in shape of CD from expressNews Ex PW-9/1 transcription of interview in program kaltak Ex.PW-9/2 Cd and transcriptsOf program capital talk and LEKIN of interview of accused Hassan Nawaz and MaryamSafdar Ex.PW-9/3 2xCDs containing your address to the nation and your address to theNational Assembly and 2x transcripts of the same are available as Ex.PW-9/7 and Ex.PW-9Letter dated 28-12-2018 Ex.PW-9/5 letter dated 27-12-2017 Ex.Pw -9/6 transcripts ofInterview of Hassan Nawaz in program KALTAK is available as ex.pw 9/9 Cd of th programKALTAK is available ex.pw 9/10 CD of address to the nation Ex.pw9/11 CD of address toNation is available EX.PW-9/12 All these documents were seized by the 1.O in presence ofWitnesses from PW. What do you say about it?
Q.No.42: It is in evidence of pw -10 MubasharTauqir Shah Director External publicity wing information Broadcasting Division. M/O information broadcasting Islamabad that on 05.01.2017.This pw Produced acknowledgement letter Ex.PW-10/1. A letter of the NAB Ex.PW-10/2 E-mail sent by HarroonRasheed for the copy of the interview in hard talk ex.pw-10/3. CD and transcript of interview of Hassan Nawaz with Tim Sebastian in Hard talk ex.pw-10/4. Transcription of the interview ex.pw-10/5 and all these documents were seized by 1.Oin presence of witnesses and prepared seizure memo Ex.PW-10/6 signed by PWs and 1.O. What do you say about it?
Q No.43: It is in evidence of PW.11 WaqnsAlhmad, that on 10, 01.2018, this PW produced verified transeripts of 2xprogrammes Capital Talk and LEKIN in one DVD and a covering letter to the L.O. transcripts of Capital Talk comprising on 13x pages (Ex.Pw-11/3). the transeripts t program LEKIN comprising on 2 x pages (Ex.PW-11/4) and DVD having both program (Ex PW.11/5) and all these documents were seized by l.o in presence of PWs and prepared seizure memo (Ex PW-11/1), singed by PWs as witnesses. What do you say about it?
Q.No.44: It is in evidence of PW ZaverManzor, Assistant Director NAB Lahore that PW Waqas Ahmad, Senior Coordinator GEO News handed over the record to L.O of this case, which was seized by the L.O and he signed the seizure memo as a witness (Ex.PW-12/-1). What do you say about it?
Q.No.45: It is in evidence that PW Sultan Nazir, Deputy Director NAB Lahore that on 05.01.2018 Abdul Wahid Khan DG Directorate Electronic Media and Publications produced letters, transcripts 3 x CDs to LO of the case which were seized by the 1.O and he signed the seizure memo (Ex.PW-13/I). PW Syed MubasharTauqeer Shah Director External Publicity Wing also appeared before the 1.0. On 05.01.2018, he handed over the record, 3 x letters, transcription comprising on 12x pages and I x CD, the 1.O seized through seizure memo signed by him as a witness of seizure memo (Ex.PW-13/2). What do you say about it?
Q.No.46: It is in evidence that you accused delivered speech as address to Nation aired on 05.04.2016, CD of which is Ex.PW.911 and transcript is Ex.PW-9/7 wherein you had inter-alia stated that sale proceeds of Dubai factory was utilized for factory in Jeddah and Jeddah factory was sold for 64 Million Riyals ( 17 Millions Dollars) and those were the sources for purchase of London Flats. What do you say about said Documents and your speech?
Q. No. 47: It is an evidence that Hussain Nawaz (absconding accused) gave interview his that interview with Mir in program capital talk aired by geo news on 19-01-2016 CD of which is Ex.PW-11/5 and transcript is Ex. PW -11/3. Wherein inter –alia he has stated that park lane apartments were purchased from the factory of KSA.What do you say about said documents and that Interview ?
Q. No. 48: It is in evidence that Hassan Nawaz (absconding accused) gave interview aired on BBC in November 1999.His interview by Tim Sebastian in program HARD TALK in shape of CD is Ex.PW-10/4 and transcript is Ex.PW-10/5. Wherein he has inter-alia stated that he is living in park lane flats on rent and amount of quarterly rent received from Pakistan and he did not know who own these flats.
What do you say about said documents and that interview?
Q. No. 49: It is evidence that Hussain Nawaz Sharif(absconding accused) gave interview aired by Express TV on 07-03-2016.His interview by Javed Chaudhary in shape of CD Ex .PW-9/10 and transcript Ex .PW-9/9 were produced by PW-9 .He/ Hussain Nawaz has inter –alia stated that park lane apartment are belonging to them, offshore companies Nescoll Ltd.and Nielson enterprises Ltd own them/apartments and he is holding those offshore companies through a trust deed.What do you say about said documents and that interview?
Q. No. 50: It is evidence that CDs and their transcripts along –with other documents were taken in possession by the I.O through a seizure memos(Ex.PW-9/13,Ex.PW-10/6 and Ex .PW-11/1 in presence of witnesses.What do you say about it?
Q. No. 51: It is in evidence of the PW-14, Mr. Robert W.Radley,Forensic Handwriting documents Examination Expert ,principal of Radley Laboratory that he was contacted on 29-06-2017 and effectively engaged Quist Solicitors on 30-06-2017.He received copies for comparison of Jeremy freeman.On 04-07-2017 after examining these documents ,PW prepared a r5eport (Ex.PW-14/1) from the comparison of 2*declaration 2nd and 3rd of both declaration were identical which means 1 x set of these pages were the copies of the other or any further document or they are copies of further document.On 2nd and 3rd page the date against the signature of the solicitor last digit of the year was altered and the alteration of the page shows that it was 2006 but 2nd and 3rd page of both documents.What do you say about it?
Q. No. 53: It is in evidence of the PW-14, Mr. Robert W.Radley,that on 06-07-2017,PW received in his laboratory two sets in sealed envelope referred as certified declaration each document had covered pages which certified the contents as true exact copy of the original certified the contents as true and exact copy of the original certified by Michal Lindsley Notary public these two documents were the declaration of trust and copy of Nescoll and Nielsen (Ex.PW-14/2) and 2nd declaration was certified Coomber Declaration(Ex.PW-14/3). Documents were bound together with green corner piece . PW examined these declarations and prepared report on 08.07.2017 (Ex.PW-14/4), What do you say about it?
Q.No.54: It is in evidence that PW-14 Rebort W .Radley compared the certified copies , with copies previously examinedby him and finds that certified Nescoll and Nielsen Declaration correspondence with copies previously examined with respect to the certified copy to the coomber Declaration . certified copies contained as supposed to 3rd copies of the pages and 2nd copy of the declaration of coomber is different from signature page on the certified declaration is a diffrenet page to the copy coomber declaration previously presented . on general examination these copies are the colour of the good qualities , general appearence of the documents , typing is amateur and type Font is considered and identified as calibri , which was devoloped by VISTA window program , not commercially available until 31.01.2008. What do you say about it?
Q.No.55: It is in the prosecution evidence PW Robert W.Radley , that both certified copies were bound together with green corner piece through which brass eyelets had been appended. These brass eyelet has been undone , which damaged the eyelet and some portion of which broken off . What do you say about it?
Q.No.56: It is in evidence of PW-15 , Akhtar Riaz Raja solicitor quist solicitors London that quist solicitors services were hired by JIT on 12.05.2017 for professional legal services and PW received copies of bundle of papers submitted in Honble Supreme court of Pakistan , on review of The papers by him , he /PW discovered letter dated 05.01.2017(Ex.PW-15/1) from a english firm solicitors freeman box , that letter was written by solicitor jeremy freeman refering to trust declaration , first trust decalaration related to coomber group Ine. With regard to first declaration PW/he wrote to Mr. jeremy freemanbox on 27.06.2017 . On the same date PW/he received email reply from jeremy freeman who stated that Mr Hussain Nawaz attended his office with original docunents and those documents a trust documents were attached to his letter dated 27.06.2017(Exh. PW-15/2). Mr. jeremy freeman confirmed the signature of the Hussain Nawaz and Mr. Waqqr as witness . The signature confirned the contents of the letter dated 05.01.2017 (Exh. PW-15/1). What do you say about it?
Q.No.57: It is evidence that PW-15 Mr. Akhtar Riaz Raja provided copies of the two trust declaration Neilson and Nescoll declaration and coomber declaration to Mr .Redlay (PW-14), whereupon PW Redlay made report dated 04.07.2017(Exh. PW-14/1). What do you say about it?
Q.No.58: It is in evidence that PW Akhtar Riaz Raja solicitor quist solicitors London that JIT sent him further 2 * declaration of the same of Neilson and Nescoll declaration and coomber declaration , they were delivered to Mr. Radley for examination and Mr.Radley prepared report (Exh. PW-14/4) dated 08.07.2017. What do you say about it?
Q.No.59: It is in the evidence of PW-16 Mr.Wajid Zia ,additional Director General Immigration FIA HQ, Islamabad that your co-accused who happened to be your daughter and sons filed CMA No.7531 Dated 15.11.207 befor the august supreme court of pakistan contentded that steel factory by the name of gulf steel milss was established by late.MR.M.Sharif your father in 1974 , which was run by MR.Tariq shafi as ostenslble owner and the 75% of shares of GULF Steel Mills were sold against the considiration of 21 x million abu dabhi dirham which were directly paid to BCCI for the settlement of the loan liability and agreement Mr.Abdul Ahli become partner said mills to extent of 75 % and 25% shares vest in Mr. Tariq shafi sold 25 % shares of alhi steel mils against the considiration of 12 million AED , whixh wrer invested with QATRI Royal Family . the qatri Royal Family purchased Aven fied appartment s through a company nielsonh and nescoll your son / co- accused namely hassan Nawaz and Hussain nawaz started living in those appartments and paying the ground rent and servixes charges in year 2006, settelment between hussain nawaz and Qatri Royal Prince AL-Hamad-Bin jasim AL-Thani arrived , and ownership of the apartments changes through handing over the bearer shares to accused Hussain Nawaz , accused,Maryam Safdar become trustee for MR. Hussain Nawaz in pursuance of trust deed puportedly signed in 2006 (EXH.PW-16/14). What do you say about it?
Q.No.60: It is in the evidence of PW. Wajid Zia that cicil Misc application No. 75312016 agreement (exh.PW-16/7)was appended where in 3 x parties namely Tariq Shafiq , Ali-Ahli, and BBCI and all proceeds of 21 million of AED were go to BCCI company had a total of 36 billions of AED toBCCI and after payment toBCCI still 14 millions of liabiliy was responsibility of MR. Tariq shafi who was running business under the real ownership of MR.M.Sharif.There was also liabilities of 6 million AED owed to BCCI and water and electricity charges . Agreement between Tariq shafi and Ahli was Purportedly signed in 1978 (Exh.PW-016/8) and an other agreement puportedly signed on 14.04.1980(Exh.PW-16/19) , What do you say about it?
Q.No.61: Its is in the evidence of PW Mr. Wajid Zia that you co- accused filled CMA no.432/2017 (Exh.PW-16/12 ) and CMA No. 22.12.2016 Exh.PW-16/11 ) wherein a letter dated 22.12.2016 (Exh.pw – 16/12) written by AL-Hamamd bin jasim al-Thani was annexed and copy of workheet (Exh.PW-16/13) was annexed in CMA no.432/2016 giving detail of the settlement with Qatri Royal family .what do you say about it?
Q. No.62: Its is in the evidence of PW Mr. Wajid Zia that JIT through M/O Foreign Affairs and Directly written letter to his Excelencelency Sheikh Hammad Bin Jasim to join the proceedings and provide supporting documents to narration made by him in his letter dated 22.12.2016 but Qatri Royal Prince in spite of letter writing avoid joining proceedings with JIT since all naration were without any foundation what do you say about it?
Q.No.63: Its is in the evidence of PW Mr. Wajid Zia that Hudabiya Paper Milss and Al-Taufeeq company enterd into compromise .He produced consent order between the said two as Mark PW-16/F . what do you say about it?
Q.No.64: PW Mr. Wajid Zia , produced in his evidence , cop[y of incorporation certificates (Exh.PW 16/37). what do you say about it?
Q.No 65: It is in the evidence of PW Mr. Wajid Zia that in his eveidence produces official copy of register of title of 17,17-a Avenfield Properties (Exh PW -16/39),(Exh, Pw 16/40), (Exh Pw -16/41) and ( Exh PW -16/42) annexed by respondents ‘accused with CMA No 7531/2016. What do you say it?
Q.No.66: It is the evidence of PW Mr,Wajid Zia, That with CMA No 753/2016, declaration of trust of Coomber company between Maryam Safdar and Hussain Nawaz was annesed. What do you say about it?
Q.No.67: It is the evidence of PW Mr. Wajid Zia, That your co-accused annexed with CMA No. 7661/2016 declaration of trust Nescoll and Nielson between accused Maryam Safdar and Hussain Nawaz(Exh,PW-16/44). What do you about it?
Q.No.68: It is the evidence of PW Mr. Wajid Zia, that you Co-accused with CMA No 432/2017 annexed copy of opinion of Stephen Moverley Simith Quist Solicior Dated 12.01.2017 (Exh. PW -16/45). What do you say about it?
Q.No.69: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, pointed out in his statement. Two expert opinions (Exh PW-16/46). And which were considered by him. What do you say about it and expert opinion?
Q.No.70: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence mortage deed deutshe Bank (Exh.PW -16/47)annexed in CMA No. 432/2016. What do you say about it and mortagage deed?
Q.No.71: PW-16 Mr .wajid Zia, produced in his evidence letter of financial investigation Agency annexed with CMA No. 751/16(A) (Exh- PW-16/48). What do say about it?
Q. No 72: PW-16 Mr-Wajid Zia, Produced in his evidence letter relating to Nescoll Ltd addressed to financial investigating Agency from Mossack Fonesea& Co (Exh, PW -16/49) What do you say about it/ that letter?
Q.No.73: PW-16 Mr, Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence letter relating to Nielsen Enterprises addressed to financial investigation Agency (Exh. PW -16/51). What do you say about it/ that letter?
Q.No.74: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia. Produced in his evidence copy of CMA No.394/2017 (Exh. PH -16/52). What do you say about it/that letter?
Q.No.75: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence letter of Assistant General Manager Samba Financial Group dated 03.01.2005 addressed to Minerva Financial Service Ltd. Annexed in CMA No.394/2017(Exh.PW-16/52). What do you say it/that letter?
Q.No.76: PW -16 Mr, Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence, an affidavit of Shazi Naqvi(Exh.PW-16/52). What do you say about it/that affidavit?
Q.No.77: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence copies of note to financial Statements for the years ended on 31.03.2007, 31.03.2008, 31.032009, 31.03.2010, 31.03.2011,and 31.03.2012 Que Holdings Ltd.(Exh.PW-16/54,55,58,61,64 and 66). What do you say about it?
Q. No. 78: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence copies of notes to financial statement for the year ended on 31.03.2009, 31.03.2010 and 31.03.2012 of flagship security Ltd. ( Exh. PW- 16/56, 59, 62 and 67). What do you say about it.?
Q.No. 79: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence copies of notes to financial statement for the year ended on 31.03.2009, 31.03.2010 and 31.03.2012 of Quint Paddington Ltd. ( Exh, PW-16/57,60,63 and 65). What do you say about it.?
Q.No. 80: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence letter Dated 20.06.2017 received from united Arab Emirates (UAE) Ministry of justice (Exh. PW-16/69). What do you say about it/that letter?
Ans.
Q.No. 81: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence annexure of the letter dated 28.06.2017 (Exh. PW-16/70). What do you say about it?
Q.No. 82: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence Original letter in Arabic script of the English Version ( EXh. PW 16/71). What do you say about it?
Q.No. 83: PW-16 . Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence letter dated 12.06.2012(Exh.PW-16-/72). What do you say about it?
Q.No. 84: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence original enclosure of the letter dated 12.06.2012(Exh. Pw-16/73). What do you say about it?
Q.No. 85: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence letter dated 22.06.2012 from mossback fonseca ( Nescoll) (Exh. PW-16/74). What do you say about it/that letter?
Q.No. 86: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence letter dated 22.06.2012 from mossback fonseca ( Nielson) (Exh. PW-16/75). What do you say about it/that letter?
Q.No. 87: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence original certificate regarding capital FZE (Exh. PW-16/76). What do you say about it?
Q.No. 88: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence copy of form No. 9 JAFZA and employed record of you accused (Exh. PW-16-77). What do you say about it?
Q.No. 89: PW-16 Mr. Wajid Zia, produced in his evidence screenshots annexed with incorporation certificate marked PW-16/G. what do you say about it?
Q.No. 90: It is in the evidence of PW Mr. wajid Zia, Additional director general immigration FIA HQ, Islamabad that agreement dated 14.04.1980, which was annexed with CMA NO. 432 mentioned 112 million AED were made therein that available as a result of this agreement with tariq shafi which was handed over to fahad bin jaism Al- thani in cash and this investment was used for settlement of Avenfield properties in year 2006, establishment of Al-Azizia Steel Factory in KSA as well as settlement of loan with Al-Taufeeq investment Fund, Furthermore, for the settlement of companies accused Hassan Nawaz, but this assertion is without any documentary proof. Agreement is stamped at each page purportedly by Dubai Notary Public but in response of MLA ( Exh. PW-16/69), it transpired that the agreement does not exist and there is no transaction worth 12 million AED took place between Ahli Steel Mills and Taeiq Shafi, record did not indicate notarization of this document in Dubai. What do you say about it?
Q.No.91: It is in the evidence of PW-16 Me. Wajid Zia, through MLA response, it is come on record, there is no LC for transportation of scrap, machinery of Al-Ahli Mils from Dubai to KSA as per your claim in (Exh. PW – 16/10). What do you say about it?
Q.No.92: It is in evidence of PW Mr. Wajid Zia, that the contention of accused in CMA NO. 432 and 753 regarding collection 12 million AED collected from Al-Ahli in cash and deposit with Fahad Bin Jasim AL-Thani by Tariq Shafi is without any documentary proof, and wrong assertion. What do you say about it?
Q.No. 93: It is in evidence of PW Me. Wajid Zia, that the liabilities of the Gulf Steel ,ill were to the tune of Rs. 36 million out of which 21 million approximately paid as full sale process of 75%share and liabilities to tune of Rs 14 million AED were the responsibilities of the Tariq Shafi , who was working on the behalf of Me M. Sharif. Tariq Shafi, also obtained loan from BCCI, all the liabilities never cleared and even Tariq Shafi was sentenced for defending of BCCI. What do you say about it?
Q.No.94: PW – 16 Wajid Zia, stated about two letters of Me. Hammad Bin Jasim AL-Thani dated 05.11.2016 (Exh. PW – 16/11) and 22.12.2016 (Exh. PW – 16/12) and further stated that contents of which were not proved through any agreement between Sharif’s family and Al.Thani family and other supporting document. Same is fabricated and concocted story to camouflage the acquiring of properties. What do you say about it?
Q.No.95: It is the evidence of PW Wajid Zia, that as per assertion investment of 12 million AED converted into dollars, the profit earned year and disbursement made by Qatri Royal on instruction of Mian Sharif, used for setting of companies including Flagship investment but no documentary evidence of transfer of 4x transactions is provided to JIT. 3 x transactions shown to have been made to accused Husain Nawaz, and used for setting up the Al-Azizia Steel Mill in KSA transactions is not supported by any document, another transactions of 8 million dollar in year 2000 for the payment to Al- Toufiq company is shown in worksheet ( Exh. PE – 16/13),which is shown as long term loan in directors report of Hudabiya Paper Mills. What do you say about it?
Q.No.96: It is in evidence of PW Mr. Wajid Zia , that as per marked PW – 15/B, marked PW – 16/H, the lng term loan with Al-Taufiq was settled and your assertion that the same settled through payment made by Qatri Royal Family was wrong assertion since Qatri Royal had no connection whatsoever with debt of Al – Taufiq company for the investment funf, subject litigation and Avenfield properties which were attached, hence storey given in the concise statement and worksheet is false, fabricated, frivolous and concocted story to abet each other in commission of offence and creating documents to conceal the real facts, . What do you say about it?
Q.No.97: It is in evidence of PW Mr Wajid Zia, that (Ex. PW-16/13) is worksheet speculative and fabricated document forged by you accused persons. What do you say about it?
Q.No.98: It is in evidence of PW Mr Wajid Zia, that through exhibits/letter genuinely attempted to engage Mr Hamad Bin Jasim Al-Thani for verfication of the assertion made by you accused in you concise statements filed before the Supreme Court of Pakistan and supporting documents annexed with their CMAs but on you instigation and persuasion Qatari Royal on filmsy and frivolous grounds did not join investigation because you assertion and contents of letter were wrong and misleading. What do you say about it?
Q.No.99: It is in evidence of PW Mr Wajid Zia, that the accused namely Maryam Safdar provided trust deeds regarding Nielson and Nescoll and of Coomber and submitted as genuine. What do you say about it?
Q.No.100: It is in evidence of PW Mr Wajid Zia, that as per Exh. PW-16/48 and letter dated 12.06.2012 froom Director of FIA Mr Errel Jeorge addressed to Money Laundering Reporting Officer Mossack Fonseca and company about Nielson and Nescoll and response to MLA, the BVI authorities responded vide covering letter Exh. PW-16/79, it is confirmed that accused Maryam Safdar is beneficial owner of the company Nielson and Nescoll and address of accused provides as Saroor Palace Jeddah according to Exh. PW-16/79. What do you say about it?
Q.No.101: It is in evidence of PW Mr Wajid Zia, that Director Financial Investigation Agency letter dated 12.06.2012 refers to 2 x legal Instruments BVI and Anti-Money laundering regulations 2008 and BVI money laundering and Terrorist finance court of practice 2008, which provides detail for the procedure for customers due diligence and verification of the identity of the customers as per MLA,s response, accused Maryam safdar is beneficial owner of BVI companies nielson and nescoll, which owned Avenfiled apartment what do you say about?
Q.No.102: It Is in the evidence of PW MrWajid Zia that as per charts ex pw 16/80 prepared by JIT, on the basis of income tax , wealth tax and wealth statement of accused Maryam safdar, she/accused Maryam safdar did not have income that could justify the acquisition and possession of these properties in early 1999,s what do you say about it?
Q.No.103: It is in evidence of PW mrwajidzia that as per chart Ex PW 16/81 prepared by JIT on the basis of income tax , wealth tax and wealth statements of accused Hussain Nawaz and asset shown at pages 06 and pg 07 of volume IX-A. he accused Hussain Nawaz did not have income that could justify the acquisition and possession of these properties in early 1999s, what do you say about it?
Q.No 104: It is in evidence of PW mr.wajidzia that as per chart Ex PW 16/82 prepared by JIT on the basis of income tax , wealth tax and wealth statements of accused Hassan Nawaz and asset shown at pages 06 and pg 07 of volume IX-A. he accused Hassan Nawaz.he accused Hassan Nawaz did not have income that could justify the acquisition and possession of these properties in early 1999s, what do you say about it?
Q.No.105: It is in the evidence of PW Mrwajidzia that accused Maryam safdar is linked with Minerva Services Ltd before 2006, as per letter . From Samba to Minerva Financial Services Ltd. Dated 03.12.2005.What do you say about it?
Q.No.106: The PW-17 Mr. Zahir Shah produced in his evidence letter dated 20.03.2018 of Paul Crome UK Central Authority (Exh. PW-17/1) regarding the MLAs. What do you say about it?
Q.No.107: It is in the evidence of PW-17, Mr. Zahir Shah, Director General (Operations) NAB HQ, Islamabad that he received documents (Ex.PW-17/2 to Ex, PW-17/10) from Mr. Usman Ahmed on 27.03.2018 on behalf of UK Central Authority relating to Avenfield apartments in response of Mutual Legal Assistance (MLAs) forwarded by JIT. What do you say about it/documents?
Q.No.108: It is in the evidence of PW Mr. Zahir Shah, Director General (Operations) NAB HQ, Islamabad who produced official copy of register of title regarding House No. 16, Avenfield house, edition date 04.04.2016 (Exh. PW-17/2). What do you say about it/document?
Q.No.109: PW-17, Mr. Zahir Shah, produced in his statement official copy of register of title regarding house No. 16-a, Avenfield house, edition date 01.04.2016 (Exh. PW-17/3). What do you say about it/document?
Q.No.110: PW-17, Mr. Zahir Shah, produced in his statement official copy of register of title regarding house No. 17, Avenfield house, edition date 01.04.2016 (Exh. PW-17/4). What do you say about it/document?
Q.No.111: PW-17, Mr. Zahir Shah, produced in his statement official copy of register of title regarding house No. 17-a, Avenfield house, edition date 29.11.2016 (Exh. PW-17/5). What do you say about it/document?
Q.No.112: PW-17, Mr. Zahir Shah, produced in his statement Water Bills (Exh.PW-17/6) of flat No. 16, 16-a, 17 & 17-a, Avenfield house, which were paid on behalf of accused. What do you say about it/document?
Q.No.113: PW-17, Mr. Zahir Shah, produced in his statement Tax statement (Exh.PW-17/7) of flat No. 16 Avenfield house, which were paid on behalf of accused. What do you say about it/document?
Q.No.114: PW-17, Mr. Zahir Shah, produced in his statement Water Bills (Exh.PW-17/8) of flat No.16-a, Avenfield house, which were paid on behalf of accused. What do you say about it/document?
Q.No.115: PW-17, Mr. Zahir Shah, produced in his statement Water Bills (Exh.PW-17/9) of flat No.17, Avenfield house, which were paid on behalf of accused. What do you say about it/document?
Q.No.116: PW-17, Mr. Zahir Shah, produced in his statement Water Bills (Exh.PW-17/10) of flat No.17-a, Avenfield house, which were paid on behalf of accused. What do you say about it/document?
Q.No.117: It is in the evidence that the accused namely Hassan Nawaz and Hussain Nawaz are your sons and absconding in this case. What you say about it?
Q.No.118: It is in evidence that you accused joined the proceedings of Constitutional Petition No. 29, 30 of 2016 and 3/2017, wherein you accused (Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif) along-with you co-accused arrayed as Respondent No 6, 7, 8 and 9 filed CMA No. 432, 7531, 7411, 394, 7661, through which a version regarding acquistion, possession and holding of Avenfield apartments was built up. That version is in consistent with the response to the request for Mutial Legal Assistance from the government of BVI, the related certificates from the office of the Attorney General of BVI, Forensic Report of Robert W. Radley, the response to the request for MLA from the Government of UAE, evidence/response collected from JAFZA, what do you say about it?
Q.No.119: Ot is in evidence of PW-18 Mr Muhammad Imran that in response to call up notices, replies on behalf of you accused Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif and two others namely Maryam Safdar and Capt Retd Muhammad Safdar were filed on 22-08-2017. What do you say about it?
Q.No.120: It is in evidence of PW-18, Mr Muhammad Imran that he prepared seizure memos Ex. PW-18/7, Ex. PW-18/8, Ex. PW-18/9. What do you say about it?
Q.No.121: It is in evidence of PW-18, Mr Muhammad Imran that analysis chart (Ex. PW-18/13) of assets and liabilities of you accused Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif available at pg 418 of volume IX was relied by him. What do you say about it?
Q.No.122: It is in evidence of PW-18, Mr Muhammad Imran that you accused being public office holder owned and possessed Avenfield Properties which Are bearing mo, 16, 16-a, 17 and 17-a Aven field House through offshore companies namely Nielsen and Nescoll in the name of your benamidar, and has failed to account for sourcess for acquisition of said properties and these properties are in posession of you and other accused persons since 1993. What do you say about it?
Q.No.123: It is evidence of PW-16 that in your Cmas have stated to have taken possession of these Apartments at the time Mr. Hussain Nawaz was student i.e. 1993-1996. What do you say about it?
Q.No.124: it is in evidence of PW-16 that vide CMA 895, a Deutsche Bank which provided for a charge on the MayFair Apartments to provide loan to Coomber had been submitted at pg 261, 278, 279, 282, 291, 300, 302, 305, 311, 313, 325, 328, 339 and 336 of volume V11 are the financial statement of Hassan Nawaz Companies. Que Holdings, Flagships securities and Quint Paddington for the year 2007-2012. The Document shows that loan from Coomber was provided to Que Holding ltd owned by Hassan Nawaz which furthur provided funding to quint Paddington was provided loan of 614,000 pounds by Capital FZE in which you accused are also an employee. What do you say about it?
Q.No.125: What is your statement and why this refrence/case against you?
Q.No.126: Why have the prosecution witnesses deposed against you?
Q. No. 127: Will you produce any evidence in defence?
Q. No. 128: Will you appear as a witness to make statement on oath u/s 342(2) Cr.P.C?
Q. No. 129: Have you anything elso to say?
