Updated on
Summary Top NATO offical says halt in joint Afghan operations won't hurt strategy.
Following the deaths this year of 51 international troops killed by Afghan forces or militants wearing Afghan uniforms, NATO has said that troops will no longer routinely carry out operations such as patrolling or manning outposts with their Afghan counterparts.On Tuesday, NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said plans for a gradual transition to having Afghans responsible for security in the country by the end of 2014 would continue despite the suspension, which he described as prudent and temporary.The so-called green-on-blue attacks by Afghan forces or militants in their uniforms has tested the trust between NATO troops and their Afghan allies.The suspension of joint operations came amid a spate of bad news for NATO, after insurgents mounted a brazen attack on the sprawling and heavily guarded Camp Bastion base in Helmand province and destroyed or badly damage eight U.S. Marine attack jets.Meanwhile, a mistaken NATO airstrike killed eight village women and girls searching for firewood in eastern Laghman province, and eight South African civilian contractors died in a suicide bombing near Kabul airport.Fogh Rasmussen sought to put a positive spin on the decision to suspend joint operations, saying it proved that Afghan forces ware already capable of operating on their own.The measures taken to reduce the risks facing our troops wont change our overall strategy, he told reporters in Brussels.Let me be clear, we remain committed to our strategy and we remain committed to our goal of seeing the Afghans fully in charge of their own security by the end of 2014, he said. The goal is unchanged, the strategy remains the same and the timeline remains the same.Still, critics pointed out that insider attacks which have continued despite efforts to vet all 352,000 members of Afghanistans army and police forces were undermining the entire international mission in Afghanistan.In London, lawmakers criticized the suspension as potentially undermining the strategy of training local forces to provide security once U.S. and NATO forces leave Afghanistan at the end of 2014.It does appear to be a really significant change in the relationship between (coalition) and Afghan forces, said opposition Labour Party lawmaker Jim Murphy.John Baron, a member of Britains ruling Conservative Party, said the change threatens to blow a hole in our stated exit strategy, which is heavily reliant on these joint operations continuing.
